You can tell the people who can grasp that you do not have to agree with everything in a book and still enjoy it - like the Sylvia/Christina review "Everyone has their own opinions and negativity is such a large part of this world. We give you credit for writing a book and getting it published. The book is interesting and definitely made me look outside my box of thinking..." and indeed I found things I agreed things I disagreed and unlike others don't feel the need to attack the author over it vs the Saul Alinsky Cancel Culture crowd that Hate a book that literally has a chapter called LOVE VS HATE in it and therefore just want to attack the author and the book like seen in several reviews copying and pasting the same lack of imagination responses across the many sites the book is sold.

Like the authors Terror Strikes Info book site says "Fair warning - while some Historical aspects are mixed within, this is a Fictional story with Fictional characters. Many deem this book controversial and upsetting in many places, which it is meant to be. Meant to MAKE PEOPLE THINK! Challenge their own and others intentions, motives, own morality and mortality" but some cannot handle their morals and mortality challenged but only that/when they question others' and want to try to prevent others from reading a very well written book, that again sadly some just cannot handle.

B. Shamanski - Constitutionalists Podcasts Network


 

My husband [whose Editorial review appears on Amazon, as now does this] handed me a copy of "Terror Strikes: Coming Soon to a City Near You" once he was finished reading and told me I needed to read it. So glad I did. Indeed a very "distinct" and "different" book from the usual Politically biased fare available today.
 

I read the reviews and saw how Mr. Lenard was more being personally attacked than the substance of his book refuted, which is understandable when people cannot refute details then engage in personal assault. As for his Grammatical style? It is in-line with Dean Koontz, Brian Herbert, S T Joshi, and others; as outlined on the Terror Strikes website "ScoreIt" subpage; do they attack them too? Doubtful. 
 

As for other aspects of Mr. Lenard's "writing style?" It is very much in-line with many others that use the narrative and/or descriptive (per page by percentage) versus formulaic "proportion of dialog in novels" (U-Penn report); of which Hemingway is considered the master of dialog writing style. Personally I think some use to just pad page-count, or convey something they otherwise have trouble descriptively delivering, rather than enhance story. Do people criticize Dan Brown's "The DaVinci Code" written with same styling? Then there are books with zero dialog which include the likes of "The Notebook" (N. Sparks), "The Road" (C. McCarthy), "The Great Gatsby," "Catcher in the Rye," Classics, and more! Are those criticized?
 

So, yes, as one other reviewer listed on the Terror Strikes reviews page says - this book does not engage in a lot of dialog. In my opinion, it didn't need to. For my part, I greatly enjoy both stylings, but books like this are indeed the smaller part of the market, while others follow the Pack. Both make for great reads, for different reasons.
 

I for one am happy Joseph M Lenard's "Terror Strikes: Coming Soon to a City Near You" has the courage to take the path less tread in his adoptive style.
 

D. Shamanski - Constitutionalists Podcasts